By Rachel Hutchisson
Overhead. It’s a dirty word in the nonprofit sector. And, yep, I just said it.
In fact, I said it not just for myself, but also on behalf of my colleagues – Andrew Watt (of AFP International), Jacob Harold (of Guidestar) and David Whitehead (of AARP and the AARP Foundation) – who are joining me as presenters on the topic at the 10th annual Bridge Conference this July 7-9th in Washington D.C.
Why talk about overhead? Isn’t that kind of boring? Well, no. In fact, it’s flat out essential and often both misunderstood and overlooked. So that’s WHY we’re talking about it, to clarify what it means, to encourage a broader understanding of why it matters and, finally, to motivate nonprofit leaders to be proactive about how they dispel “the overhead myth.”
So where to begin? With this question – what’s impact and overhead anyway? In the cleanest and simplest of terms, impact is the actual good a nonprofit does – its ultimate end-game. It’s a clean environment, access to basic human rights and education, art that inspires and engages, communities working together for peace.
Although vital to our world, these outcomes are hard to measure. How are nonprofits measured instead? Often, they are looked at as good or bad depending on what their Form 990 says, about how much money they raise versus how much they spend raising it. And that’s where the word “overhead” comes in, too often as a negative weapon. Instead of looking at the good being done, nonprofits are often evaluated by how much it cost to deliver that good (i.e. the overhead). The problem is that costs vary, and to say 100% of the money an organization raises goes directly to mission, well, that’s just not realistic. What about the people, the technology, and the goods needed to deliver a truly lasting, positive end result? (No company would ever be expected to deliver a product or service without costs being incurred.)
This is the issue we’ll be digging into in our session – how overhead (and an overzealousness by some to get that % as low as possible) can work against the idea of impact (the good being done). Striking a balance and spending wisely is important, of course, but it’s unfair to evaluate a nonprofit based on a number in a Form 990 without putting those numbers in context. That means defining what impact means for the organization, defining the costs associated and working with like organizations not only to compare results, but also to develop best practices.
Why do this? Because nonprofits need to own the overhead issue and turn it into a positive, proactively conveying to donors what they do, how efficiently they do it and what their success rates are in the end. They need to do this because the donors supporting nonprofits are changing, not just giving money, but also investing money. And where there is an investment, there is a strong hope for a return. Any nonprofit seeking funds today should own the responsibility for telling its own story, using data to show progress and keeping the focus on achievement, not costs in a vacuum.
Interested in hearing more? Join Andrew, Jacob, David and me for an interactive discussion on Wednesday, July 8th at the Bridge Conference.
Contact the Author:
Rachel Hutchisson, Corporate Citizenship & Philanthropy
(0) Readers Comments
November 12, 2012
October 08, 2012
September 12, 2012
July 23, 2012
Oh boy...Your right we hate to hear this. You know why people in pain
Doesn't the 1.5 billion is spent a year give credence to its possitive
Many MS drugs cause PML and deaths too these drugs all need t
I knew him when he was breaking in at a couple of Los Angeles TV stati
Saying there is a 'twist' is the worst type of spoile